Yesterday, while surfing the web, I came by a little more than a two year old post on the Atheist Conservative that criticized Michelle Bachmann for expressing support for the MEK. It was written by Jillian Becker. It starts off attacking the MEK and then goes on to then attack Michelle Bachmann over her alleged position on teaching intelligent design in schools.
The post repeats Khomeinist disinformation and cited [and promoted] Michael Rubin, whose anti-MEK claims have played so much into the hands of Khomeinist propagandists that one of their own propaganda sites have publicly praised him for it. The post just parrots off what Michael Rubin wrote and, in effect, parrots off Khomeinist disinformation. For what sense did it make to support Stalin against Hitler in WWII; but not the MEK, which, unlike Stalin, is fighting for democratic rule, against the Naiz-like Muslim Fundamentalist regime in Tehran?
No comments:
Post a Comment